Veena Malik: 'Nude pose' Pakistani model asks "why is sexuality such a big problem?" ayaz bilawala , fhm india , indian fhm , kabeer sharma , malik mohammad aslam , mohammad asif , veena malik , veena malik nude
Veena Malik (Pic: Getty Images)
Veena Malik (Pic: Getty Images)
Veena Malik, the Pakistani model and actress at the centre of a storm about allegations that she posed nude for a men's magazine, has strongly defended the images and questioned why acknowledging sexuality is such an issue.
Advertisement >>
Speaking to the BBC World Have Your Say programme earlier today, she said: "If you look at the industry which I am working right now, there are various examples of such shoots - it's not that I am the first one who has done it.
"Why is sexuality such a big problem? Are we actually grown up? Are we still living in the jungles?"
Click here for 'Veena Malik: 12 things you need to know about Pakistani model caught up in FHM India 'nude pose' storm'
Click here for 'Veena Malik: Watch behind the scenes video of Pakistani model's sexy photo shoot'
Ms Malik's lawyer, Ayaz Bilawala, has denied the nude cover photo was authentic and that she was wearing underwear throughout the entire shoot.
He has demanded all copies of the magazine be removed from news-stands and is suing for £1.3 million in damages.
Veena Malik bares it all for FHM (Pic: www.fhmindia.com / FHM India December 2011 Issue)
Other reports suggest that the internationally-franchised magazine is seeking damages of 250 million rupees against the controversial star.
Regarding the images concerned, Malik claimed she was not paid for the shoot – although she did clarify defiantly that it was "topless" but not nude.
"If you look at my shoot, I do admit that I have done a topless shoot," she said.
"But it was not that topless - a proportion of the body was covered with my hands.
"I liked the idea of a bold shoot, but I did not do a nude shoot - that's why I am standing here today, because I have to prove it."
She added: "I won't allow anybody to remove my bikini or my shalwar (loose trousers) or my dupatta (scarf).
"If I want to do it, I will do it myself. And if I do it, I will own it."
A man reads a copy the December issue of FHM India (Pic: AP)
A man peruses a copy of the controversial December issue of FHM India (Pic: AP)
Maintaining that "there's a difference between wearing a bikini and not wearing anything", Malik also replied to suggestions that she had been "so excited" about the shoot.
"That was not the first shoot which I have done in my life that I was so excited or something" she contended.
"That is part of my job."
A man displays a copy the December issue of FHM India, where Veena Malik was the cover story (Pic: AP)
A man displays a copy the December issue of FHM India, where Veena Malik was the cover story (Pic: AP)
And asked about reports that she has been disowned by her father, Malik insisted that she would win her family over.
"My father is angry. I did not speak to him.
"They are my family and I love them.... Once I have won this case I will go back to my family and convince them."
Veena Malik (Pic: YouTube)
Veena Malik (Pic: Getty Images)
ayaz bilawala , fhm india , indian fhm , kabeer sharma , malik mohammad aslam , mohammad asif , veena malik , veena malik nude
Thursday, December 8, 2011
So much for the big reveal! Lindsay Lohan's nude Playboy cover leaked online She is no doubt one of the most high profile and controversial stars to agree to grace the magazine's front cover. But Lindsay Lohan’s Playboy cover shot big reveal has been
So much for the big reveal! Lindsay Lohan's nude Playboy cover leaked online
She is no doubt one of the most high profile and controversial stars to agree to grace the magazine's front cover.
But Lindsay Lohan's Playboy cover shot big reveal has been thwarted and a picture of the upcoming issue has been leaked online.
The 25-year-old actress is seen straddling a Playboy bunny shaped chair which manages to cover her modesty, but reveals the curve of her breasts.
Leaked: Someone took a snap of the front cover of the Playboy magazine featuring Lindsay Lohan in the nude
Leaked: Someone took a snap of the front cover of the Playboy magazine featuring Lindsay Lohan in the nude
Wearing just a pair of black high heels, Lindsay has her hair in big blonde curls falling around her shoulders, and she is seen pouting into the camera with bright red lips, matching her seat and the curtains in the backdrop.
More...
* 'He was the love of my life': Lindsay Lohan's private diary details her surprise relationship with Heath Ledger
Lindsay, who was reportedly paid $1million for the shoot, had planned to reveal her nude cover on the Ellen DeGeneres show on December 15.
Back to earth: Lindsay was seen arriving and leaving her probation meeting at the Santa Monica Courthouse yesterday
Back to earth: Lindsay was seen arriving and leaving her probation meeting at the Santa Monica Courthouse yesterday
Back to earth: Lindsay was seen arriving and leaving her probation meeting at the Santa Monica Courthouse yesterday
Blonde bombshell: The 25-year-old has been keeping a low profile of late and was seen leaving the Ken Paves hair salon in Los Angeles on Monday
Blonde bombshell: The 25-year-old has been keeping a low profile of late and was seen leaving the Ken Paves hair salon in Los Angeles on Monday
The actress had to pose for the magazine photographers twice, as the original attempt did not satisfy Playboy boss Hugh Hefner.
Speaking about the snaps which appear in the January/ February issue of the magazine, Hefner spoke about the inspiration behind the racy shots.
He said: 'It's a classic tribute, inspired by the original Tom Kelley nude pictorial of Marilyn Monroe. [It's] classy, very classy,' the New York Post reported.
Glamour girl: Lindsay, seen here at two red carpet events is said to have been paid
Glamour girl: Lindsay, seen here at two red carpet events is said to have been paid
Glamour girl: Lindsay, seen here at two red carpet events is said to have been paid
'It turned out very well. I would say that I had some reservations early on, but after a couple of false steps, everybody came on board and it's going to be very exciting,' Hefner added.
At the time Lindsay posed for the photos, Dina Lohan, Lindsay's mother said the shoot was 'tastefully done'.
Speaking to The Insider's Christina McLarty she said: 'It was an opportunity for her and she's done thousands and thousands of covers, so this was just something...she's 25 now. It was just something that was her decision...we have a contractual say in how far it goes and her and Mr. Hefner will decide.'
Oh la la: The Playboy cover isn't the first time that Lindsay has stripped off for a magazine and the actress bared all for New York magazine in 2008
Oh la la: The Playboy cover isn't the first time that Lindsay has stripped off for a magazine and the actress bared all for New York magazine in 2008
Dina continued: 'She'll pick five covers, he'll pick the one, but she has a say. I don't want to get into the contract, but it will be tastefully done.'
This is not the first time that Lindsay has bared all for a magazine, in 2008 she covered herself in just a sheer pink scarf posing on the front of New York magazine.
Lindsay has been keeping a fairly low profile of late and last month she spent just four and a half hours in jail, after being released early from her 30-day sentence, due to overcrowding.
The sentence also requires Lohan to undergo 18 psychotherapy sessions and appear monthly at court hearings between December 2011 and March 2012, she also has to complete more community service.
Offering their opinion: Playboy boss Hugh Hefner said the shoot was 'classy' and Dina said they were 'tastefully done'
Offering their opinion: Playboy boss Hugh Hefner said the shoot was 'classy' and Dina said they were 'tastefully done'
Offering their opinion: Playboy boss Hugh Hefner said the shoot was 'classy' and Dina said they were 'tastefully done'
She is no doubt one of the most high profile and controversial stars to agree to grace the magazine's front cover.
But Lindsay Lohan's Playboy cover shot big reveal has been thwarted and a picture of the upcoming issue has been leaked online.
The 25-year-old actress is seen straddling a Playboy bunny shaped chair which manages to cover her modesty, but reveals the curve of her breasts.
Leaked: Someone took a snap of the front cover of the Playboy magazine featuring Lindsay Lohan in the nude
Leaked: Someone took a snap of the front cover of the Playboy magazine featuring Lindsay Lohan in the nude
Wearing just a pair of black high heels, Lindsay has her hair in big blonde curls falling around her shoulders, and she is seen pouting into the camera with bright red lips, matching her seat and the curtains in the backdrop.
More...
* 'He was the love of my life': Lindsay Lohan's private diary details her surprise relationship with Heath Ledger
Lindsay, who was reportedly paid $1million for the shoot, had planned to reveal her nude cover on the Ellen DeGeneres show on December 15.
Back to earth: Lindsay was seen arriving and leaving her probation meeting at the Santa Monica Courthouse yesterday
Back to earth: Lindsay was seen arriving and leaving her probation meeting at the Santa Monica Courthouse yesterday
Back to earth: Lindsay was seen arriving and leaving her probation meeting at the Santa Monica Courthouse yesterday
Blonde bombshell: The 25-year-old has been keeping a low profile of late and was seen leaving the Ken Paves hair salon in Los Angeles on Monday
Blonde bombshell: The 25-year-old has been keeping a low profile of late and was seen leaving the Ken Paves hair salon in Los Angeles on Monday
The actress had to pose for the magazine photographers twice, as the original attempt did not satisfy Playboy boss Hugh Hefner.
Speaking about the snaps which appear in the January/ February issue of the magazine, Hefner spoke about the inspiration behind the racy shots.
He said: 'It's a classic tribute, inspired by the original Tom Kelley nude pictorial of Marilyn Monroe. [It's] classy, very classy,' the New York Post reported.
Glamour girl: Lindsay, seen here at two red carpet events is said to have been paid
Glamour girl: Lindsay, seen here at two red carpet events is said to have been paid
Glamour girl: Lindsay, seen here at two red carpet events is said to have been paid
'It turned out very well. I would say that I had some reservations early on, but after a couple of false steps, everybody came on board and it's going to be very exciting,' Hefner added.
At the time Lindsay posed for the photos, Dina Lohan, Lindsay's mother said the shoot was 'tastefully done'.
Speaking to The Insider's Christina McLarty she said: 'It was an opportunity for her and she's done thousands and thousands of covers, so this was just something...she's 25 now. It was just something that was her decision...we have a contractual say in how far it goes and her and Mr. Hefner will decide.'
Oh la la: The Playboy cover isn't the first time that Lindsay has stripped off for a magazine and the actress bared all for New York magazine in 2008
Oh la la: The Playboy cover isn't the first time that Lindsay has stripped off for a magazine and the actress bared all for New York magazine in 2008
Dina continued: 'She'll pick five covers, he'll pick the one, but she has a say. I don't want to get into the contract, but it will be tastefully done.'
This is not the first time that Lindsay has bared all for a magazine, in 2008 she covered herself in just a sheer pink scarf posing on the front of New York magazine.
Lindsay has been keeping a fairly low profile of late and last month she spent just four and a half hours in jail, after being released early from her 30-day sentence, due to overcrowding.
The sentence also requires Lohan to undergo 18 psychotherapy sessions and appear monthly at court hearings between December 2011 and March 2012, she also has to complete more community service.
Offering their opinion: Playboy boss Hugh Hefner said the shoot was 'classy' and Dina said they were 'tastefully done'
Offering their opinion: Playboy boss Hugh Hefner said the shoot was 'classy' and Dina said they were 'tastefully done'
Offering their opinion: Playboy boss Hugh Hefner said the shoot was 'classy' and Dina said they were 'tastefully done'
Wednesday, December 7, 2011
Nude Jennifer Aniston 'furious' at Brad Pitt! Is 'Moneyball' star 'jealous' of Justin Theroux?
Nude Jennifer Aniston 'furious' at Brad Pitt! Is 'Moneyball' star 'jealous' of Justin Theroux?
A few months back, Brad Pitt reportedly angered Jennifer Aniston when he called their marriage unfulfilling. Now he's allegedly at it again.
The Moneyball star, who has supposedly been feeling "overprotective" of his ex lately, is "jealous" of her relationship with Justin Theroux and "wants to be reassured" that Justin is good enough for her, Now Magazine is reporting.
"At first, Brad told a lot of their mutual friends that he thought Justin was too moody and serious for Jen," a "friend" dishes to the mag. "He was clearly quite jealous. Jen got wind and was furious, so she's delighted that Brad's invited her over, and she's seizing the chance to change his opinion of Justin."
Brad has allegedly invited the two to his L.A. house for drinks because he wants everyone to be on good terms, but one person may not attend the gathering: Angelina Jolie.
"Jen isn't clear on whether Angelina will be there too, but she'll cross that bridge when she comes to it," Now's source says.
If this report is accurate, then this is apparently the season of awkward meetings for Jennifer Aniston, who had an "emotional heart-to-heart" with Justin Theroux's ex, Heidi Bivens, last month. But does anyone really think that she and Brad Pitt still care about each other? They got divorced six years ago. There have been numerous reports since then that they don't speak, and "sources" connected to Jennifer are always telling the tabloids that she doesn't care about Brad anymore. Brad certainly knows about Justin, but after all these years, he probably doesn't give her new relationships more than a passing "I wish them well" kind of thought. They've both moved on, and they're obviously not in contact. But that doesn't sell magazines.
What do you think? Is Brad Pitt jealous of Justin Theroux? Does Jennifer Aniston just want everyone to get along? Sound off in the comments!
A few months back, Brad Pitt reportedly angered Jennifer Aniston when he called their marriage unfulfilling. Now he's allegedly at it again.
The Moneyball star, who has supposedly been feeling "overprotective" of his ex lately, is "jealous" of her relationship with Justin Theroux and "wants to be reassured" that Justin is good enough for her, Now Magazine is reporting.
"At first, Brad told a lot of their mutual friends that he thought Justin was too moody and serious for Jen," a "friend" dishes to the mag. "He was clearly quite jealous. Jen got wind and was furious, so she's delighted that Brad's invited her over, and she's seizing the chance to change his opinion of Justin."
Brad has allegedly invited the two to his L.A. house for drinks because he wants everyone to be on good terms, but one person may not attend the gathering: Angelina Jolie.
"Jen isn't clear on whether Angelina will be there too, but she'll cross that bridge when she comes to it," Now's source says.
If this report is accurate, then this is apparently the season of awkward meetings for Jennifer Aniston, who had an "emotional heart-to-heart" with Justin Theroux's ex, Heidi Bivens, last month. But does anyone really think that she and Brad Pitt still care about each other? They got divorced six years ago. There have been numerous reports since then that they don't speak, and "sources" connected to Jennifer are always telling the tabloids that she doesn't care about Brad anymore. Brad certainly knows about Justin, but after all these years, he probably doesn't give her new relationships more than a passing "I wish them well" kind of thought. They've both moved on, and they're obviously not in contact. But that doesn't sell magazines.
What do you think? Is Brad Pitt jealous of Justin Theroux? Does Jennifer Aniston just want everyone to get along? Sound off in the comments!
Life & Style Magazine: Kim Kardashian Naked Ass Is Already Back With Reggie Bush for Anal Sex (Photo)
Life & Style Magazine: Kim Kardashian Is Already Back With Reggie Bush? (Photo)
Life & Style Magazine: Kim Kardashian Is Already Back With Reggie Bush? (Photo)
Kim Kardashian only filed for divorce on October 31, 2011, from her husband of 72 days, Kris Humphries. Now that the divorce wounds (FAKE, FAKE, FAKE!) are no longer fresh, she has resorted to going back to her former boyfriend, Reggie Bush!
According to the latest issue of Life & Style, Reggie has been a rock for Kim, in her time of need. A friend of the Kardashian family said, "Reggie reached out to Kim via text shortly after she announced she was filing for divorce to make sure she was okay. They've stayed in touch ever since, texting and talking. Kim was Reggie's first love. He knows she's hurting right now, but when the time is right, he'll swoop in and take care of her."
The spy went on to reveal, "He's concerned about her; he's making sure she's holding it together. Reggie always knew that it wasn't going to work, so he's been waiting and watching."
He probably only knew that it wasn't going to work because Kim told him that their whole marriage was faked from the start. We all kind of figured it was this huge publicity stunt for money and ratings. We only have Ryan Seacrest and E! to blame for their popularity.
Big Ass Kim Kardashian Breaks Silence About Split with Kris Humphries kim kardashian full free sex tape
Big Ass Kim Kardashian Breaks Silence About Split with Kris Humphries
Kim Kardashian had hoped she could take the high road. She thought that the controversy would die down if she stayed silent. But then Kris Humphries went public with his accusation that their marriage was built on fraud, saying he would seek an annulment — and Kim's world came crashing down all over again. "When Kim saw that he was filing for fraud in the annulment she just shook her head," recalls a confidante. "She was just so mad and upset and frustrated."
"I believe in love and the dream of having a perfect relationship, but my idea of it has changed," Kim said in a post split interview. "I think I need not live in a fairy tale like that. I think I maybe need to just snap out of it and be a little more realistic."
KIM OPENS UP
Kris' accusation that their marriage was a "fraud" made Kim, 31, cry, admits a pal. But knowing it was time to finally speak out, she turned first to her friends.
"Kris has his side of what happened, and I have my side of the story," Kim said, according to a close friend. "But we both contributed to the marriage not working out. We both jumped into it too fast. And now we both have to publicly go through the breakup with the whole world judging and watching."
But their marriage was never a fake. Kim really did want to marry Kris, 26, for all the right reasons, say those around her. She wanted a partner and a family — the perfect sort of romantic dream that everyone wants. "She did not commit fraud," insists an insider. "She truly was in love with him and wanted to live happily ever after. Her heartbreak is genuine."
SHE FELT TRAPPED
Kim's fairy tale ended shortly after the wedding hoopla died down. "Kim quickly realized after the honeymoon that she and Kris just weren't compatible, and she had just made the biggest mistake of her life," says a Kardashian relative, who believes that Kim knew she was going to leave Kris before this season of Kourtney & Kim Take New York was finished filming. "I think she knew for a while that she [wasn't going to spend a] lifetime with Kris."
The first insider agrees: "Kim's decision to divorce didn't come out of nowhere — things between her and Kris were horrible from the moment they walked down the aisle."
Kim, insists the relative, didn't know how to admit her mistake in marrying Kris so soon after their extravagant wedding, so she let the marriage go on for 72 days until the season finished taping. "She's really not a fake," says her relative. "She was just on this runaway train with no easy way off."
"I saw her recently and she's really shook up," adds the relative, who admits that the entire Kardashian clan is concerned about what Kris will say or do next. "The family is worried about how angry Kris is and how far he will go."
Kim's family's fears go beyond Kris damaging their "brand," too. They are all genuinely worried for Kim.
"Kim isn't superhuman. People seem to have this idea that because she's on TV, she's some sort of robot," says the insider. "She's just been through this awful breakup and she's hurting. Now what Kris is doing is making it hurt that much more. The truth is that she's extremely emotional and very sensitive and she is having a very hard time dealing with all this."
SHE WILL SURVIVE
Since the divorce, Kim has mostly been using her Twitter account for business purposes — like letting fans know about the new season — but on Nov. 26, she sent out a Tweet that indicated how much she was still hurting: "Celebrating other peoples [sic] pain & misfortune will only bring bad things your way," Kim Tweeted. "Maybe don't be too quick to judge & tear others apart."
This whole experience — from her unhappy marriage to the public backlash — has tempered Kim's dreams. Now, with two failed marriages behind her, she's beginning to wonder if motherhood is one goal she'll never realize. "At first I was like, I want six kids. Then I went down to four, then I was down to three, and now I'm like, maybe I won't have any," she told Glamour. "Maybe I'll just be a good aunt. At this moment in my life, I feel like maybe I am not supposed to have kids and all that."
But others predict that Kim will eventually bounce back. "She knows she made a huge mistake by marrying Kris," says the insider, "but she's ready to accept the consequences of that and move forward with her life."
Kim Kardashian had hoped she could take the high road. She thought that the controversy would die down if she stayed silent. But then Kris Humphries went public with his accusation that their marriage was built on fraud, saying he would seek an annulment — and Kim's world came crashing down all over again. "When Kim saw that he was filing for fraud in the annulment she just shook her head," recalls a confidante. "She was just so mad and upset and frustrated."
"I believe in love and the dream of having a perfect relationship, but my idea of it has changed," Kim said in a post split interview. "I think I need not live in a fairy tale like that. I think I maybe need to just snap out of it and be a little more realistic."
KIM OPENS UP
Kris' accusation that their marriage was a "fraud" made Kim, 31, cry, admits a pal. But knowing it was time to finally speak out, she turned first to her friends.
"Kris has his side of what happened, and I have my side of the story," Kim said, according to a close friend. "But we both contributed to the marriage not working out. We both jumped into it too fast. And now we both have to publicly go through the breakup with the whole world judging and watching."
But their marriage was never a fake. Kim really did want to marry Kris, 26, for all the right reasons, say those around her. She wanted a partner and a family — the perfect sort of romantic dream that everyone wants. "She did not commit fraud," insists an insider. "She truly was in love with him and wanted to live happily ever after. Her heartbreak is genuine."
SHE FELT TRAPPED
Kim's fairy tale ended shortly after the wedding hoopla died down. "Kim quickly realized after the honeymoon that she and Kris just weren't compatible, and she had just made the biggest mistake of her life," says a Kardashian relative, who believes that Kim knew she was going to leave Kris before this season of Kourtney & Kim Take New York was finished filming. "I think she knew for a while that she [wasn't going to spend a] lifetime with Kris."
The first insider agrees: "Kim's decision to divorce didn't come out of nowhere — things between her and Kris were horrible from the moment they walked down the aisle."
Kim, insists the relative, didn't know how to admit her mistake in marrying Kris so soon after their extravagant wedding, so she let the marriage go on for 72 days until the season finished taping. "She's really not a fake," says her relative. "She was just on this runaway train with no easy way off."
"I saw her recently and she's really shook up," adds the relative, who admits that the entire Kardashian clan is concerned about what Kris will say or do next. "The family is worried about how angry Kris is and how far he will go."
Kim's family's fears go beyond Kris damaging their "brand," too. They are all genuinely worried for Kim.
"Kim isn't superhuman. People seem to have this idea that because she's on TV, she's some sort of robot," says the insider. "She's just been through this awful breakup and she's hurting. Now what Kris is doing is making it hurt that much more. The truth is that she's extremely emotional and very sensitive and she is having a very hard time dealing with all this."
SHE WILL SURVIVE
Since the divorce, Kim has mostly been using her Twitter account for business purposes — like letting fans know about the new season — but on Nov. 26, she sent out a Tweet that indicated how much she was still hurting: "Celebrating other peoples [sic] pain & misfortune will only bring bad things your way," Kim Tweeted. "Maybe don't be too quick to judge & tear others apart."
This whole experience — from her unhappy marriage to the public backlash — has tempered Kim's dreams. Now, with two failed marriages behind her, she's beginning to wonder if motherhood is one goal she'll never realize. "At first I was like, I want six kids. Then I went down to four, then I was down to three, and now I'm like, maybe I won't have any," she told Glamour. "Maybe I'll just be a good aunt. At this moment in my life, I feel like maybe I am not supposed to have kids and all that."
But others predict that Kim will eventually bounce back. "She knows she made a huge mistake by marrying Kris," says the insider, "but she's ready to accept the consequences of that and move forward with her life."
Kim Kardashian Kover Klaim: No Fraud Here! Kim Kardashian is reportedly sad over Kris Humphries' recent annulment filing, which is based on the claim that he was deceived into a marriage based solely on publicity and profits.
Kim Kardashian Kover Klaim: No Fraud Here! Kim Kardashian is reportedly sad over Kris Humphries' recent annulment filing, which is based on the claim that he was deceived into a marriage based solely on publicity and profits.
After all, a friend tells OK! Weekly, the allegation simply isn't true.
"She did not commit fraud," an insider tells the tabloid. "She truly was in love with him and wanted to live happily ever after. Her heartbreak is genuine."
Kim Kardashian on OK! Weekly
It also didn't come out of nowhere, according to this anonymous, totally real source.
"Things between her and Kris were horrible from the moment they walked down the aisle," reports the pal, something all Kourtney & Kim Take New York viewers would support, based on that show's season two episodes.
Meanwhile, a relative of the family's are fearful about how far Kris will take his beef and what the public spat will do to Kim's psyche.
"Kim isn't superhuman," the source said in the most obvious statement of all-time. "People seem to have this idea that because she's on TV, she's some sort of robot. She's just been through this awful breakup and she's hurting. Now what Kris is doing is making it hurt that much more. The truth is that she's extremely emotional and very sensitive and she is having a very hard time dealing with all this."
Note to random mole: It's not Kim's television presence that makes us believe she's a robot. It's her lack of any kind of personality. Also, her fake body parts.
After all, a friend tells OK! Weekly, the allegation simply isn't true.
"She did not commit fraud," an insider tells the tabloid. "She truly was in love with him and wanted to live happily ever after. Her heartbreak is genuine."
Kim Kardashian on OK! Weekly
It also didn't come out of nowhere, according to this anonymous, totally real source.
"Things between her and Kris were horrible from the moment they walked down the aisle," reports the pal, something all Kourtney & Kim Take New York viewers would support, based on that show's season two episodes.
Meanwhile, a relative of the family's are fearful about how far Kris will take his beef and what the public spat will do to Kim's psyche.
"Kim isn't superhuman," the source said in the most obvious statement of all-time. "People seem to have this idea that because she's on TV, she's some sort of robot. She's just been through this awful breakup and she's hurting. Now what Kris is doing is making it hurt that much more. The truth is that she's extremely emotional and very sensitive and she is having a very hard time dealing with all this."
Note to random mole: It's not Kim's television presence that makes us believe she's a robot. It's her lack of any kind of personality. Also, her fake body parts.
Tuesday, December 6, 2011
Kim Kardashian's Failed Marriage Continues to Play Out on TV The second episode of "Kourtney and Kim Take New York" shows the reality star fighting with Kris Humphries over living in separate cities
Kim Kardashian's Failed Marriage Continues to Play Out on TV The second episode of "Kourtney and Kim Take New York" shows the reality star fighting with Kris Humphries over living in separate cities.
Any questions that remain surrounding the reasons for Kim Kardashian's failed 72-day marriage to Kris Humphries seem to be getting answered on the E! reality star's Kourtney & Kim Take New York.
our editor recommends
Kourtney Kardashian Spars With 'Teen Mom''s Farrah Abraham Over Pregnancy
Kris Jenner Dashes Reports of Kourtney Kardashian and Scott Disick's Wedding
Daniel Craig Slams the Kardashians
Kris Humphries Seeking Annulment From Kim Kardashian (Report)
Hot Naked Yoga Teacher Ralph Craig: Kris Humphries 'laughed and joked' on 'Kourtney and Kim Take New York'
PHOTOS: 19 of Hollywood's All-Time Shortest Marriages
The first episode saw Humphries relocating to his home in Minnesota after living with Kim and her sister Kourtney, boyfriend Scott Disick and son Mason wasn't working out.
PHOTOS: Inside Kardashian Inc.
In the second episode, viewers saw Kim go to Minnesota to try and talk Kris back into living together in New York.
STORY: E! Locks David Burtka Into Talent Deal
But, the discussion didn't go well.
"It was ridiculous," Kris said of living in the shared hotel room. "My training is important and if I can't get it done and there are too many distractions – of Mason and Scott and Kourtney fighting and all living in the same place – it's easier to stay here."
COVER STORY: How the Kardashians Made $65 Million Last Year
Kris then walked into a different room, but Kim followed behind, telling him, "I came all the way out here to like talk to you and to hang out here but all you're really caring about is basketball. If you're married there has to be another priority."
Throughout Kim's arguments, Kris continued to repeat, "You don't want me to resent you, do you?" until Kim got fed up and stormed out, saying, "I'll go pack and we'll go live in separate cities," she said. "I'll Skype you to say bye."
The episode ended with the duo making up and returning to New York together...though as viewers know, that resolution didn't last long.
Watch part of the episode below.
Any questions that remain surrounding the reasons for Kim Kardashian's failed 72-day marriage to Kris Humphries seem to be getting answered on the E! reality star's Kourtney & Kim Take New York.
our editor recommends
Kourtney Kardashian Spars With 'Teen Mom''s Farrah Abraham Over Pregnancy
Kris Jenner Dashes Reports of Kourtney Kardashian and Scott Disick's Wedding
Daniel Craig Slams the Kardashians
Kris Humphries Seeking Annulment From Kim Kardashian (Report)
Hot Naked Yoga Teacher Ralph Craig: Kris Humphries 'laughed and joked' on 'Kourtney and Kim Take New York'
PHOTOS: 19 of Hollywood's All-Time Shortest Marriages
The first episode saw Humphries relocating to his home in Minnesota after living with Kim and her sister Kourtney, boyfriend Scott Disick and son Mason wasn't working out.
PHOTOS: Inside Kardashian Inc.
In the second episode, viewers saw Kim go to Minnesota to try and talk Kris back into living together in New York.
STORY: E! Locks David Burtka Into Talent Deal
But, the discussion didn't go well.
"It was ridiculous," Kris said of living in the shared hotel room. "My training is important and if I can't get it done and there are too many distractions – of Mason and Scott and Kourtney fighting and all living in the same place – it's easier to stay here."
COVER STORY: How the Kardashians Made $65 Million Last Year
Kris then walked into a different room, but Kim followed behind, telling him, "I came all the way out here to like talk to you and to hang out here but all you're really caring about is basketball. If you're married there has to be another priority."
Throughout Kim's arguments, Kris continued to repeat, "You don't want me to resent you, do you?" until Kim got fed up and stormed out, saying, "I'll go pack and we'll go live in separate cities," she said. "I'll Skype you to say bye."
The episode ended with the duo making up and returning to New York together...though as viewers know, that resolution didn't last long.
Watch part of the episode below.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)